The topic of artificial intelligence is on everyone’s lips. A real competition has even broken out between Microsoft and Google: ChatGPT vs. Google Bard. But: What do AI language models actually keep you from each other? We asked around. A comment by ChatGPT on Google Bard.
Note: The following comment is from ChatGPT (version 4.0). We didn’t make any changes, just added subheadings.
BASIC thinking: Write a snarky 400-word comment on Google Bard.
ChatGPT: Google Bard – the supposed masterpiece of the tech giant that has already swamped us with its digital products and services. Now Google is trying to convince us of its artistic competence and understanding of poetry and the human spirit.
A truly snarky comment on this latest development is in order, as it shows once again how far the tech giant is willing to put its fingers in a variety of pots. Let’s start with the obvious: Google already has enough problems to contend with.
Google Bard: This is ChatGPT’s opinion
Data breaches, algorithmic discrimination, and inadequate privacy protections are just a few of the many challenges the company faces. Rather than address these serious issues, Google seems to prefer investing its time and resources into developing an AI designed to create lyrical masterpieces.
Ironically, these “masterpieces” are often nothing more than a conglomeration of incoherent phrases and metaphors that do not even come close to the depth and beauty of human poetry.
Google Bard presents itself as a groundbreaking tool that is said to inspire and shape the next generation of poets and thinkers.
But how inspiring is it really when we have to admit that we now rely on AI to create our artistic expressions? It is tragic that we so lightly brush aside the work of human poets, whose works have been admired for centuries. It is precisely these works that have shaped our culture and history.
Is Google Bard stifling human creativity?
Google Bard is another example of tech companies expanding their dominance and venturing into areas that have traditionally been subject to human creativity. One could argue that this foray into the world of poetry ultimately harms cultural diversity and the freedom of artistic expression.
Instead of encouraging human creativity, Google Bard threatens to stifle it and replace it with an artificial, superficial version of art. Another point of criticism concerns the extent to which Google Bard is really able to think outside the box and produce innovative, culturally relevant poetry.
Artificial intelligence is notoriously known for struggling to grasp the nuances and subtleties of human emotions and experiences. Can an AI like Google Bard really muster the empathy that is so crucial in poetry? Or are we doomed to face a new wave of soulless, mechanical texts that undermine the true value of human art and poetry?
ChatGPT vs. Google Bard:
Overall, Google Bard raises a multitude of ethical and cultural issues that urgently need to be discussed. While technology undoubtedly has the potential to enrich our lives in a multitude of ways, we should carefully consider which areas of our lives and culture can really benefit from artificial intelligence and which are better left to the human mind.
The use of AI in poetry could also result in those who rely on AI atrophying their own creative and critical thinking abilities. Is this the price we are willing to pay to find a quick fix for lack of inspiration or writer’s block?
Is it worth sacrificing the unique beauty and diversity of human poetry just to maintain the illusion of technological superiority? While Google Bard presents itself as an innovative tool designed to help us expand our creative abilities, there is a danger that in reality it only serves to stunt our own artistic development and increasingly alienate us from the true nature of poetry .
Artificial intelligence vs. human
Instead of focusing on creating an AI that produces clumsy and superficial verse, Google should better focus its resources on improving the quality of its search engine, protecting the privacy of its users, and strengthening its overall social responsibility.
It is undeniable that AI and technology have the potential to augment human capabilities and help us solve complex problems. But in a world where technology is increasingly invading our lives, it’s important to stop and reflect: how much of our human experience and culture are we willing to give up to support the ever-evolving technological revolution?
Shouldn’t we be focusing on empowering human creativity and intuition instead of entrusting them to a cold, calculating AI? Finally, Google Bard is a prime example of how tech companies are trying to gain more and more control over our lives and culture.
Instead of letting AIs like Google Bard dictate how we interpret and create art and poetry, we should reflect on what truly defines us: our human nature, our capacity for empathy, and our immeasurable creativity. With that in mind, it’s time to shed the veil of technological superiority and get back to what really matters: the human experience in all its beauty and diversity.